Blog

Tax News & Views Won't Shut Down American Frogs Roundup

By Joe Kristan
October 21, 2025

Key Takeaways

  • Day 21 of the shutdown.

  • Trump adviser threatens "stronger measures." 

  • Tariff challengers brief the Supreme Court.

  • Betting markets say TACO.

  • 3M transfer pricing case: our man weighs in.

  • IRS criminal reorganization concerns.

  • American Frog Day.

 

"This is Day 21 of the government shutdown. There’s no solution in sight to this crisis." - Punchbowl News

 

Trump Adviser Sees ‘Stronger Measures’ If Shutdown Continues - Lauren Dezenski and John Harney, Bloomberg via MSN:

National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett said on CNBC Monday that unless Democrats set aside their health-care demands and support a federal spending package “the White House is going to have to look very closely” at “stronger measures.”

...

Trump last week also said he plans to release a list of “Democrat” programs for cuts. The president said he would do that last Friday, but no document was released.

 

Tariff Tuesday: Supreme Court, China, Cattle

Emergency Tariffs Unlawfully Unprecedented, Justices Told - Dylan Moroses, Law360 Tax Authority ($):

The International Emergency Economic Powers Act has never been used until President Donald Trump to impose tariffs, and nowhere does the law provide that explicit authority, a dozen states, several small businesses and a pair of Illinois toymakers told the U.S. Supreme Court Monday.

The small businesses led by VOS Selections Inc. told the Justices in their brief that the language in IEEPA that Trump and the federal government have relied on to impose a bevy of tariffs on major trading partners cannot provide that kind of authority, noting that the "power to regulate is not the power to tax," and the U.S. Constitution weighs each term differently.

The Court is scheduled to hear the case November 5.

 

Trump demurs, China hardens - Ari Hawkins, Politico:

‘I’M NOT LOOKING TO DESTROY CHINA': Trump conceded in an interview aired Sunday that imposing an additional 100 percent tariff on Chinese imports would not be realistic in the long term.

“It’s not sustainable, but that’s what the number is,” Trump told Fox Business host Maria Bartiromo. “It could stand. But they forced me to do that.”

...

Trump also expressed confidence that his tariff threats would pressure Xi to reverse expansive restrictions on rare earth exports. Those curbs followed the Trump administration’s crackdown last month on subsidiaries of blacklisted firms — a move aimed at preventing China from bypassing export controls.

 

What Betting Markets Show About Trump - Natasha Solo-Lyons, Bloomberg:

It’s become clear to anyone watching that Trump often doesn’t follow through on what he promises, pledges or threatens. And the prediction markets bear that out, O’Brien and Silverman write. From tariffs to firing cabinet officials to what executive orders he would sign, bettors assigned an average probability of 34% to those events occurring within a specified timeframe. And in the end, only 28% actually happened.

The smart money seems to be on the 79-year-old Republican doing absolutely nothing, they write: You would have made a $12 net profit for every $100 you spent. See for yourself how the professionals are gaming out this moment in American history.

 

Trump Hopes Argentina Can Help Bring Down Meat Prices - Alan Rappeport, New York Times:

With beef prices soaring, President Trump is considering an idea that is at odds with his usual mantra that nearly everything should be made in the United States.

Mr. Trump, who has imposed tariffs on nearly everything that America imports, said that he was considering buying beef from Argentina to bolster supplies and curb rising prices. The idea contradicts Mr. Trump’s guiding economic philosophy of erecting import barriers to encourage domestic production. It also suggests that the president believes that in some cases, open markets can be an antidote to rising prices.

“We would buy some beef from Argentina,” Mr. Trump said to reporters aboard Air Force One on Sunday. “If we do that, that would bring our beef prices down.”

More imports result in lower consumer prices? Would that work with, say, steel and aluminum? Or even cars and trucks?

 

Trade and Taxes

Beyond Common Ownership: the Next Frontier of Transfer Pricing Rules?- Chad Martin, Eide Bailly:

One of the most fundamental—and profound—questions in transfer pricing is: “What is a related party?” This question frequently arises in joint ventures, private equity portfolios, and complex group ownership structures. The answer typically centers on the concept of common control.

...

The most common determinant of common control is common ownership—where the same related-party interests own more than half of the associated enterprises. However, both U.S. and OECD guidance clarify that common control is distinct from common ownership.

 

3M Case Marks Pathway for Coca-Cola’s Transfer Pricing Victory - Tristan Navera, Bloomberg ($):

In a case involving 3M Co., the US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit earlier this month reversed the US Tax Court, determining that IRC Section 482 doesn’t necessarily grant the IRS power to reallocate income from overseas units to a US company for tax purposes.

The decision marked an upheaval in how courts interpret that provision, as the IRS has long asserted it had such authority.

Chad Martin, a principal of transfer pricing services at Eide Bailly LLP, says Coca-Cola stands to gain from the 3M decision, which showed that courts can and will step in to read vague tax code provisions.

That’s especially true for the “uniquely positioned” Section 482, a law that conveys broad IRS power to reallocate income without clear constraints in just a few sentences, he said.

Related: Eide Bailly Transfer Pricing Services.

 

IRS - Layoffs, Favoritism Questions

Questions are piling up - Bernie Becker, Politico:

Congressional Democrats have two big questions for the IRS right now: how the agency is handling layoffs during the current government shutdown, and if it might change how it investigates nonprofit groups.

Whether lawmakers will be able to get answers at the moment is another question. Democratic aides say they have had trouble getting answers out of the agency on even cursory questions during the shutdown, as the IRS works with barely half of its workforce at the moment.

...

Democrats on the House Ways and Means Committee also want more answers out of Bessent.

They want their GOP counterparts to convene a meeting with Bessent about last week’s Wall Street Journal report that the IRS plans to place allies of President Donald Trump in the agency’s criminal investigations unit, which would then open the door to more inquiries into Democratic-aligned groups.

 

Inconsistent Tax Enforcement Is a Threat to All - Karen Kelly, Tax Notes ($):

Recent events at the IRS and Justice Department threaten fair and uniform tax enforcement in the United States. Inconsistent tax enforcement threatens the financial well-being of all Americans. Tax law, more so than any other federal law, touches and affects the lives of all Americans — from the largest corporations to individuals who file tax returns solely to receive payments from the IRS, including the earned income tax credit.

Karen Kelly is the former acting assistant attorney general and delegated component head of the Justice Department Tax Division.

 

Look Through is Through

IRS to Scrap Look-Through Rule for Qualified Investment Entities - Jonathan Curry, Tax Notes ($). "A 10-year exemption from the foreign-controlled domestic corporation look-through rule would become permanent under newly proposed guidance from the IRS and Treasury."

 

Treasury Floats Plan To Scrap Look-Through Rules - Natalie Olivo, Law360 Tax Authority ($):

The U.S. Treasury Department proposed regulations Monday that would remove rules that allow revenue officials to, in a manner of speaking, look through the corporate owners of real estate investment entities to determine whether they are domestically controlled.

The proposed regulations would eliminate rules Treasury uses to determine when to treat domestic real estate investment companies as foreign-owned under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act. In general, FIRPTA taxes foreign investors on sales of shares in real estate investment trusts unless at least 50% of a given REIT is owned by a nonpublic domestic company.

...

Under Section 897, REITs are considered domestically controlled — and thus exempt from taxes on sales of shares — if less than 50% of the stock is held "directly or indirectly" by foreign corporations or individuals. 

 

Blogs and Bits

Federal government shutdowns, then and now - Kay Bell on Substack. "Adding insult to injury is that this shutdown, like almost all such closures, was made possible by members of Congress, all of whom are still being paid."

IRS issues penalty relief for remittance transfer providers ahead of new 1% excise tax - National Association of Tax Professionals. "Starting in 2026, a 1% excise tax will apply to certain outbound remittance transfers, payments sent from the United States to recipients in other countries. The tax applies when the transfer is made using cash, money orders, cashier’s checks or other similar physical instruments. Electronic transfers initiated through banks or payment apps are not affected unless they fall under specific qualifying conditions outlined in the new guidance."

The Border-Adjusted Tax Trap - Adam Michel, Liberty Taxed. "First, Trump loves tariffs, not because they’re good economics, but because he sees tariffs as a negotiating tool, a way to reward friends, and punish rivals. Replacing the International Emergency Economic Powers Act tariffs with a border adjustment tax may result in additional revenue, but it is unlikely to meet Trump’s economic and non-economic reasons for loving tariffs. Americans would likely end up paying higher tariffs and the new corporate income levy."

 

Paying For the Big Destination Wedding

Tax Startup CEO Swindled $13M From Investors, SEC Says - Anna Scott Farrell, Law360 Tax Authority ($; name omitted):

The CEO of a defunct tax-compliance startup lied to investors as she raised $13 million for her company, overstating its revenues by almost 900 times and falsely claiming she was a certified public accountant, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission said Monday in California federal court.

In a complaint, the SEC accused [the defendant] of fraudulently raising money from venture capital investors from October 2020 until the L.A.-based ComplYant App Inc. "ran out of cash and abruptly ceased operations" in September 2023, just on the heels of raising $750,000 from new investors.

...She repaid a student loan, footed expenses for her destination wedding in the Caribbean, bought Super Bowl tickets and put more than $700,000 toward the purchase of her $1.1 million house, according to the complaint.

 The investors apparently did not require audited financial statements:

She told investors that the company's revenue grew from $2,500 monthly to $250,000 between November 2020 and September 2022, when in reality the company never made more than $510 in a single month during that time and struggled to keep customers, according to the SEC.

This is why I stick with index funds.

 

What day is it?

It's American Frog Day! Accept no Argentine frogs, I guess.

Make a habit of sustained success.

Every organization deserves to realize its full potential. Let us help you find yours.
Learn More

About the Author(s)

Joe Kristan

Joe B. Kristan, CPA

Partner
After 38 years centered on tax consulting for closely held businesses and their owners, Joe is joining Eide Bailly's National Tax Office. Joe's responsibilities include communication, process improvement and training. He is a principal contributor to the Eide Bailly Tax News and Views blog, providing daily updates on tax reform and other tax news. Joe is a Certified Public Accountant and a member of the AICPA Tax Section and Iowa Society of Public Accountants.

Any opinions expressed or implied are those of the author and not necessarily those of Eide Bailly. Opinions found in linked items are those of the authors of the linked item, not of your bloggers or of Eide Bailly. “$” means link may be behind a paywall. Items here do not constitute tax advice.